Yeah, George. That got me thinking, so I looked back at the census info I had for him, which is the 1850, 1860, 1880, 1900 and 1910. They all seemed to place his birth year in about '43-'44. The 1900 actually lists birth month and year as Aug, 1844, but the 1910 lists him at 75, which would put him at 1835. I know that one is way off. It was definitely not an exact science back then.