Right-O Charlie boy, he gave an opinion everyone else was giving him facts. He wanted someone to agree with his opinion, no one did and several factual posts were made to clarify the mass grave burials and Phil; “yes butted” every one of them. He was fishing for someone to second his opinion. Looks like he finally found someone eh? He never gave the opinion that the mass grave was by no means a dishonor; he tried to promote the idea burying Shaw in a mass grave with his soldiers was a dishonor. It is pretty clear to me you don’t know who posted what.
Right-O again Charlie boy I asked him a simple question the answers could have been answered A, B, or C. he couldn’t or wouldn’t answer. I gave him a chance to clarify his post and by not doing so left it open to be interpreted any way someone may want to read it.
I believe my comprehension level is probably equal or greater than yours. This is the post I was referring to and even asked which country he was referring to
http://history-sites.com/cgi-bin/bbs53x/nvcwmb/webbbs_config.pl?read=59482. This is the particular paragraphs --
“Why are the kidnappers considered the ones in the right, and the victims, the ones who are called under such law offenders? Leave race out of the equation completely. This to me is the most outrageous offensive and indefensible position any governemt claiming to be fighting for their "rights" could ever make. Yet make it they did. How did a society founded upon such outrageous and open legal hypocricy ever expect to survive?
It is completely and totally absurd and cannot in any way shape or form be logically defended by anyone not totally bereft of logic. To me it is the very heart of the matter of the attempt by folks who still today try to defend such nonsense. Since it is impossible to defend, the defenders must go to very extravagant lengths, take tortured stands and defy all logic and common sense, doomed to forever try to make a sows ear into a silk purse. The argument therefore can never end, because, when stripped to its core, defenders of this absurd principle, having nothing supporting them but endless justification, continue to attempt to justify that which cannot ever be justified.”
In the future it would serve you well to know what you are talking about before posting. You are so far off it is unbelievable, I never even addressed the issue of the men of the 54th Mass. Being traitors. If you think I did, show me. You can be amazed all you want and you can try and discredit me all you want, won’t work bud. I do this every day and you wouldn’t make a blackhead on the behind of some of my opponents. You don’t like my style of discussion, don’t reply to me. You jumped I didn’t.
Yes I just might be part of the elite, and yes I would take the position of Minister of Education because no doubt in my mind I more than likely have better knowledge of the war than you.
What is with the low class B*** S*** German? Are you trying to imply something and just don’t have what it takes to come out and say it?
George Purvis Minister of Education
PS:
Go back and find where I posted a factual response to Phil. I asked him a question.
You see I don’t have to attack you are your credibility; anyone is free to read this board and see how wrong you are.