"So it is with Sons of the South and their famous "Lost Cause." Brandishing selective quotes from Abraham Lincoln, citing slogans about "states' rights," and emboldened by hagiographic histories of Lee and his lieutenants, the Sons (and daughters) of the South have convinced themselves, and many others, of something that never was."
is that exactly what the writer of the article is doing? What is the difference? I really would lo9ve to know what is wrong using accurate sourced material to prove a point???