How did I personally attack you? I plainly explained how the term "neo-Confederate" has been (and can be) used to describe people within certain interests groups without larger, negative meanings. You accused me of "trying to be cute," being "condescending" and "insulting," and then excused yourself for taking an unusually "aggressive" approach in your response because you were "insulted." I don't think I am the one here having problems with someone challenging their views.

As for "charges of emotionalism," you admitted that you were all worked up. Why is the fact that I acknowledged your admission unfair?