The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Union Soldiers as Presidents

Here's a discussion starter that occurred to me yesterday. We know that the majority, almost all, of the post-Civil War presidents through William McKinley were former Union Army generals and officers. Do you believe it was better for a peaceful reunification of North and South to be administered by these men or would men from the private or purely political sector have been better?

Jim

Messages In This Thread

Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents