The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
In Response To: Union Soldiers as Presidents ()

Jim, I will keep this very short and simple. Of course it would have been better for a peaceful and more aggressive and productive reconstruction in the definitive terms if those Presidents had not served in the Union Army in any capacity.

I have many many reasons to cite but there's no point, my mind is made up.

Mark

Messages In This Thread

Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents
Re: Union Soldiers as Presidents