The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum

Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?

"The 50 to 75 yard effective range would have made them not quite as effective as the .69 smoothbore of the time using Buck and Ball ammunition."

I would like to see that tested. Those 40 .45 cal balls would be coming pretty fast against a .69 smoothbore musket (whose hit rate was pretty poor). The known pump was awkward but effective. The compressed air cylinder was detachable- like the Army Revolver, where extra cylinders could be carried, the soldier could carry extra cylinders in a bag. Again, this would have added to the cost of the weapon to produce.

Messages In This Thread

Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why? *PIC*
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Me either, or is it eIther? *NM*
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?
Re: Air Rifle...not Civil War, but why?