Wikipedia has an interesting section of flags of all sorts. Here's a blurb from their section on the Georgia flag -- "A federal appeals court noted in 1997 that the 1956 resolution changing the flag was part of a larger legislative package that year from the Georgia General Assembly which included bills rejecting Brown v. Board and following up on then-Governor Marvin Griffin's announcement that "The rest of the nation is looking to Georgia for the lead in segregation."
I don't know how you feel, but I've always been a little suspicious of Wikipedia. As I understand it, anyone can post an article, then the article is fine-tuned by consensus. I'm not sure I entirely trust it as an encyclopedia, in the traditional sense. I mean, what's to keep a child molester posting an article about the beneficial aspects of child abuse? It's one of them new-fangled computer doo-dads that I don't entirely understand. What's your take on it?