The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: Belligerent Parties
In Response To: Re: Belligerent Parties ()

Chief, I suspect that without the recognition of belligerancy, any captured Confederates would not have been exchanged, but would have been liable to trial for treason. Even without formal recognition, this status protected the soldiers from such retribution. After the cessation of hostilities, the real questions about whether secession was legal precluded any trials, despite the desires of the radicals in Congress. Stan

Messages In This Thread

Legality Question
YES *NM*
NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Recognition
Re: Recognition
"Belligerent status"
Re: "Belligerent status"
Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
What would have meant ---
Re: What would have meant ---
Re: What would have meant ---
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
War Between The States.
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Good Subject Doyle! *NM*
Re: Good Subject Doyle!
Re: Good Subject Doyle!
Re: Good Subject Doyle!
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question