The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: Belligerent Parties
In Response To: Re: Belligerent Parties ()

I do remember how upset they were with the Trent Affair. Don't say I blame them either. With their 'neutral' status, that allowed for the private English enterprise to conduct trade as in ship building, merchandise and such to the Confederacy's advantage. That is, if they didn't get caught trying to bring stuff into the waters of the CSA.
France was also helpful in the Naval area. The USS Alabama was welcome there.

Pam

Messages In This Thread

Legality Question
YES *NM*
NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Re: NO !!!!!
Recognition
Re: Recognition
"Belligerent status"
Re: "Belligerent status"
Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
What would have meant ---
Re: What would have meant ---
Re: What would have meant ---
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
Re: Belligerent Parties
War Between The States.
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Good Subject Doyle! *NM*
Re: Good Subject Doyle!
Re: Good Subject Doyle!
Re: Good Subject Doyle!
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question
Re: Legality Question