The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: "Traitors"
In Response To: Re: "Traitors" ()

Frank, as I stated before I seemed to have lost sight of Phil's original post and it's meaning. We HAVE thoroughly discussed this topic with all, including yourself making great points in the discussion. I always love David Upton's approach but I believe that Doyle put it best as I so stated in one of my posts. Remember that character "Craig" that lurked around here some time back and Jim's question of why he even bothered posting on this board? I recall his response as something like "it's something to do during my lunch break". HAHA. He was an instigator and I feel that Phil is following in his footsteps. It's as if he sees that there are posts on the subject but refuses to read and comprehend them. I can surely see why Dr. Hodge felt it his duty as a moderator, even if "self appointed" to step in and put a stop the bantering on the Tennessee board. This guy keeps asking "what is 2+2" but he won't accept 4 as an answer. Somehow I think he is trying to make the answer greater than 4. ;-)

Keith

Messages In This Thread

"Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Its a New Year everybody!
Re: Its a New Year everybody!
Re: Its a New Year everybody!
Re: Its a New Year everybody!
Re: Its a New Year everybody!
Re: Its a New Year everybody!
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Re: "Traitors"
Congratulations