The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum

Re: Confederate Secret Service
In Response To: Re: Confederate Secret Service ()

"Is there some rule that a country can't take out the leader of a hostile power? Or is there a rule that only applies to the Confederacy?"

"Assassination and poisoning are therefore contrary to the laws of war, and equally condemned by the law of nature and the consent of all civilized nations. The sovereign who has recourse to such execrable means should be regarded as the enemy of the human race; and the common safety of mankind calls on all nations to unite against him, and join their forces to punish him." Vattel, "The Law of Nations," p. 469 (361) (Philadelphia 1852); See also Halleck, "International Law," p. 400 (New York, 1861).

As for it applying only to the Confederacy, no, it doesn't. If Jefferson Davis had been shot in the back of the head while unarmed and watching a play with his wife, the person who did it would be an assassin.

More recently, Executive Orders 11905, 120536 and 12333 state that "No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination." Following 9/11, the CIA was reportedly given authority by President Bush to take out terrorist leaders.

Messages In This Thread

Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
ROFL!!!! *NM*
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Interesting Post! *NM*
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Neither Am I *NM*
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Confederate Secret Service
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
How about "Invading Army"?
Re: How about "Invading Army"?
Re: How about "Invading Army"?
Re: How about "Invading Army"?
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Agreed, Keith *NM*
Thanks Joe *NM*
Re: Agreed, Keith
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal
Re: Terminology - Union vs Federal