The Alabama in the Civil War Message Board - Archive

Re: Mounted Infantry
In Response To: Re: Mounted Infantry ()

This starts to paint a picture that I've never seen, taken as information from multiple units.

It would appear that there may be some rhyme or reason to this distribution of firearm types. It looks like there may be a reason that the type of arms was mixed, perhaps different troopers were used in different ways tactically, and that the weapon that they carried were for a certan purpose based on their assignment. Else, why not just consolidate and re-issue weapons all of one type to one unit? That method would certainly have advantages unless there was some other purpose for the mixed distribution. And, the final statement seems to imply that this unit should have a certain number of certain type arms.

Messages In This Thread

Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Opps. Correction.
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Partisan Rangers
Re: Partisan Rangers
Re: Partisan Rangers
Re: Partisan Rangers
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Mounted Infantry
Re: Arms of 7th Tenn under Forrest in 1864