The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: A Comment...
In Response To: Re: A Comment... ()

"It does not admit of the use of poison in any way, nor of the wanton devastation of a district."

In a recent post of letters to and from Sherman, it was noted that salt was spread on arable land, to make it unable to grow crops for some time. Does that constitute poison?

You are right about the ambiguity. Anything written by lawyers admits aof interpretation; I suppose that's so the lawsiuts can proceed! LOL Stan

Messages In This Thread

Comparing Northern and Southern destruction
A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Sherman's Comments
Re: Sherman's Comments
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Thanks Jim *NM*
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Sure, no problem. *NM*
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Re: A Comment...
Don't have a a heart attack
Re: Don't have a a heart attack
Re: Don't have a a heart attack
Re: Don't have a a heart attack
Re: Don't have a a heart attack
BTW, I didn't have a heart attack
Re: BTW, I didn't have a heart attack
another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: excellent point!
Re: excellent point!
Re: another comment
Re: another comment
Re: Comparing Northern and Southern destruction
Re: Comparing Northern and Southern destruction