The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: Was it really about slavery

The Lincoln regime may have got what it wanted, but the South's actions played right into the Republican's hands.

Lincoln was a Lawyer, and good Lawyers know how to play their cases (and Juries) to win in court. The South seceding to keep the institute of slavery was a no win situation. Lincoln could play the good guy, while the South's image would not look good to the world, no matter how Constitutional the realm of slavery was, or how many slaves were in the North.

Might made right, no matter how wrong it was used, it is hoped that we ALL could learn from that, though history has proved that wrong.

It’s like trying to fight against the craze of “Global Warming” everyone has jumped on that bandwagon, and anyone fighting AGAINST that “cause” is going to look bad, no matter what they do.

Kevin Dally

Messages In This Thread

Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
War crimes glorified
Re: War crimes glorified
Re: War crimes glorified
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Thanks, Chase
Re: Thanks, Chase
Re: Thanks, Chase
Re: Thanks, Chase
Re: Was it really about slavery
Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
And----
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Symmetry
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
RR shipments
Re: RR shipments
Worked on RR`s for 43 yrs... *NM*
Re: RR shipments
Re: RR shipments
Re: RR shipments
Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
We all lost
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
I agree *NM*
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Or sugar Daddy ? *NM*
Re: Or sugar Daddy ?
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Ann Nicole did.. *NM*
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery