The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: Well, yeah...it was
In Response To: Re: Well, yeah...it was ()

"Following the line of thought that has been established here, I would like you to prove that the institution of slavery was the heart of the matter. Because people did not want slavery or slaves in their state, isn't it possible that simply meant blacks?"

Many northern whites wanted neither slavery or blacks in their communities. That meant both slaves as individuals and slavery as an economic, political and social institution. That is why northern whites often opposed slavery as an institution...but not for the benefit of blacks.

Slavery was still at the heart of the matter, for without that institution (and people wanting to extend it), the issue of a "black" presence in the states and territories would not have existed.

Messages In This Thread

Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
War crimes glorified
Re: War crimes glorified
Re: War crimes glorified
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Thanks, Chase
Re: Thanks, Chase
Re: Thanks, Chase
Re: Thanks, Chase
Re: Was it really about slavery
Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
And----
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Symmetry
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Well, yeah...it was
BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Re: BTW Craig
Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
RR shipments
Re: RR shipments
Worked on RR`s for 43 yrs... *NM*
Re: RR shipments
Re: RR shipments
Re: RR shipments
Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Superiority of Trains
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
We all lost
Re: Depends on what you mean by "RIGHTS"
Re: Well, yeah...it was
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
I agree *NM*
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Or sugar Daddy ? *NM*
Re: Or sugar Daddy ?
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Ann Nicole did.. *NM*
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery
Re: Was it really about slavery