The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum - Archive

Re: Ex Post Facto
In Response To: Re: Ex Post Facto ()

Oh contrair mon frair,,,

The 14th amendment made secession a treasonable crime. Now before this secession wasn't, therefore the rule of Ex Post Facto came into play in Davis's case, by their own rules Davis couldn't betryed for treason, because at the time he was involved in secession, it wasn't a crime. If it isn't a crime, then reason would say that it is legal.

Messages In This Thread

Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Fort Sumter and amphibious operations
Re: Fort Sumter and amphibious operations
Re: Fort Sumter and amphibious operations
Re: Fort Sumter and amphibious operations
Re: Fort Sumter and amphibious operations
Re: Fort Sumter and amphibious operations
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Re: Answering Craig
Who was convicted of treason?? *NM*
Changing the question?
Re: Changing the question?
Re: Changing the question?
Re: Changing the question?
Re: Changing the question?
Absolutely no case...repeat from Dec. 17th, 2006
Re: Absolutely no case...repeat from Dec. 17th, 20
Re: Changing the question?
Ex Post Facto
Re: Ex Post Facto
Re: Ex Post Facto
Re: Changing the question?
Re: Changing the question?
Re: Changing the question?
Re: Changing the question?
Re: Answering Craig
Try this link
Re: Try this link
Thanks George. *NM*